Factors related to human safety and security are most important when prioritising areas for invasive alien plant (IAP) management across the
Cape Town metro. This was the surprizing finding of a study by C·I·B PhD student, Luke Potgieter, and a multi-disciplinary team
including C·I·B core team members Dave Richardson and Mirijam Gaertner, CSIR researcher Patrick O’Farrell, and project managers at
the City of Cape Town’s Green Jobs Unit. The study, which identifies high-priority sites for IAP management at landscape- and local scales, was
published in the journal Environmental Management.
Alien plant invasions in urban areas have considerable impacts on biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being. Managing urban plant
invasions is needed to alleviate such negative impacts. However, effective management is particularly challenging given the complex interactions
between ecological, economic and social elements that exist in the urban milieu. Conflicts of interest frequently arise when attempting to control
and eradicate IAPs as urban residents perceive IAPs and their management both negatively
and positively. Managing urban plant invasions therefore requires a strategic approach to guide management across the urban landscape, and a
tactical approach to plan and coordinate control efforts on the ground. Prioritising land parcels for invasive species control assists with funds
being appropriately allocated and utilised, resulting in the highest return on investment being achieved.
The figure shows overall priority areas for the management of invasive alien plants across the City of Cape Town, South Africa.
Potgieter and colleagues used multi-criteria decision tools to develop a prioritisation framework for managing IAPs in urban areas at landscape
and local scales. A stakeholder workshop was held to develop and rank criteria for prioritising IAP management in the City of Cape Town, South
Africa. By matching spatial data with selected criteria and applying their multi-criteria decision analysis in a Geographic Information System, they
developed a strategic landscape-scale prioritisation map. They also modified an existing IAP management framework to develop a tactical (site-level)
prioritisation scheme for guiding on-the-ground control operations.
Their study identified high-priority areas for IAP management at landscape- and local scales across the City of Cape Town. Factors related to
safety and security (such as fire risk to infrastructure, risk of flooding, and areas at risk of being illegally occupied) emerged as key features
for setting spatially-explicit priorities for IAP management. The overall approach resulted in an intuitive framework for dealing with the
complexities involved in decision-making processes in urban environments.
“The process followed here has established a set of clear, transparent and agreed priorities which can be used to guide the allocation
of limited funds” says Potgieter. “Our dual prioritisation approach can be tailored to address different IAP management objectives
specific to other urban centres around the world.”
Read the full papers at:
Potgieter, L. J., Gaertner, M., Irlich, U. M., O’Farrell, P. J., Stafford, L.,
Vogt, H., & Richardson, D. M. Managing urban plant invasions: a multi-criteria prioritization approach. Environmental Management.
Potgieter, L.J., Gaertner, M., O’Farrell, P.J. and Richardson, D.M. 2018.
Perceptions of impact: invasive alien plants in the urban environment. Journal of Environmental Management.
For more information, contact Luke Potgieter at email@example.com