The effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of protected areas on taxon richness and abundance. Positive
boxplot values indicate a net positive impact of protected areas on biodiversity. Sample sizes are in grey, the vertical black
lines show a zero effect size. PLOS ONE.
Protected areas conserve biodiversity and more action is needed to ensure safeguards are in place to protect these
areas, were two of the main findings of a recent study by C·I·B researchers. Published in the scientific journal,
PLoS ONE, researchers from the Centre for Invasion Biology, Monash University (Australia), and the University of Exeter (UK),
used meta-analysis — combining results from different studies — to look at the past 30 years of research into protected areas, to
determine whether they actually protect biodiversity.
Lead author Dr Bernard Coetzee said that protecting an area from human exploitation made common sense; however, up
until now there had been little evidence to determine whether these conservation areas actually protected biodiversity. “Our work
has now shown that protected areas have significant biodiversity benefits. In general, plant and animal populations are larger and more
species are found inside rather than outside protected areas. In other words, protected areas are doing their job.”
The researchers said national parks, nature reserves and other ways of setting land aside to protect species had
long been a key strategy in the conservation of biodiversity. However, there was a lot of controversy about the effectiveness of
protected areas in conserving biodiversity. Some studies showed that fewer species and lower populations of key species were found
inside, compared to outside reserves. Others showed just the opposite.
Dr Coetzee said the level of conflicting evidence was worrying as it made political decisions to protect new areas,
often at significant cost, problematic. This research shows that protecting areas does work to conserve biodiversity, and it should
remain a key strategy for conservation going forward, but we need more action to ensure increased coverage and better safeguards for
their long term maintenance. “This research means that protecting areas and spending hard-contested budgets on their maintenance
are worthwhile for all governments. It also shows that achieving the Convention on Biodiversity’s 2020 Aichi Target 11 to increase
protected area coverage to 17 per cent of land and inland water areas will really help protect biodiversity,” Dr Coetzee said.
Read the paper:
Coetzee, B.W.T., Gaston, K.J. and Chown, S.L. (2014) Local scale comparisons of biodiversity as a test for global protected area ecological performance: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9(8): e105824. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105824.
For more information contact Bernard Coetzee at firstname.lastname@example.org.