A recent paper by Sabrina Kumschick, C·I·B Core Team Member, together with C·I·B Director Dave
Richardson and C·I·B Associate Tim Blackburn investigated whether the birds on the “100 worst” lists are indeed
worthy of this honour.
Lists of harmful species such as “100 of the worst” lists are important to educate the public about alien
invasive species and the impacts they can cause. However, they have limited use for management and scientific purposes, as the selection
on lists are arbitrary and not based on transparent criteria.
The paper, published in Bird Conservation International, suggests a new approach for alien species listing
according to their impacts, using a semi-quantitative method.
Dr Kumschick and colleagues researched the impacts of the birds listed on two of the most frequent used lists, namely the
“100 of the World's Worst Invasive Alien Species”
list of the IUCN and the “100 of the Worst” list of
invaders in Europe.
They used a generic impact
scoring system to compare the magnitude of impacts between species, as well as the mechanisms through which the impacts can be caused. This
includes for example competition for food and nesting sites, predation on native species, and socioeconomic impacts such as feeding on
agricultural crops and disease transmission to humans.
Dr Kumschick and colleagues found that the two lists represent some of the worst invasive birds, and the most important
mechanisms causing impacts, with some overlap between the species on the IUCN list.
“As a way forward, we suggest selecting the “worst” alien species according to a transparent system
or guidelines, and backing up such a selection with quantitative data. This would not affect the educational purpose of the lists, but
could lead to a more balanced representation of the types of impacts that alien species can cause,” explains Dr Kumschick.
The Canada goose (Branta canadensis), reaching the highest impact score amongst the birds so far
Read the paper
Kumschick, S., Blackburn, T.M. and Richardson, D.M. 2016. Managing alien bird species: Time to move
beyond “100 of the worst” lists? Bird Conservation International, Volume 26, Issue 02, Pp 154 - 163
For more information, contact Sabrina Kumschick at firstname.lastname@example.org