Biological invasions are a major threat to already complex social-ecological systems and require the integration of knowledge
from various disciplines and stakeholders. Accordingly, there have been strong calls for integrated approaches to developing solutions that
address the threat.
A study conducted by Brent Abrahams (C·I·B PhD student) and supervised by Prof Karen Esler (C·I·B
Core Team Member) and Dr Nadia Sitas (Centre for Complex Systems in Transition) at Stellenbosch University, made use of qualitative content
analysis to provide an overview of the research produced under the auspices of the Working for Water Programme from 1995 to 2015 and to assess
the extent to which research outputs reflect the integration of diverse disciplines.
The study found that Working for Water associated research focused mainly on the ecological processes and impacts associated
with invasive alien plants and biological control. While social science and operationally focussed research are, under-represented and few and
far between. The over-representation of ecological research may be concerning to funders, like Working for Water, because more social and
economic studies are needed to inform and guide their decision-making. However, in the context of invasion biology and the management of
invasions in the country, the importance and necessity of ecological research shouldnít be ignored. Strong cases have been made for investing
in ecologically focused research and capacity building towards addressing challenges associated with the management of invasive alien plants. While
an over-representation of ecologically focused research isnít inherently problematic, a lack of integration with economic or socially focused
knowledge may be, particularly when addressing social-ecological system challenges.
Integrative approaches to research that engage the social sciences is necessary to solve complex social-ecological challenges. But,
doesnít occur automatically - even when public funding encourages it. Integrative research involves more than simply aggregating several
disciplines into a single research project. Instead it requires the effective coordination and interaction between relevant stakeholders and
creating environments that encourage the incorporation of multiple knowledge systems. As well as a more pluralistic approach towards achieving
specific social-ecological system initiative mandates. Encouragingly, there have been efforts towards improving the integration (albeit limited
with respect to socially focused research) of numerous disciplines, knowledge systems and stakeholders in the planning and research processes,
and towards informing operations within the Working for Water context.
Integrative research approaches, such as transdisciplinarity, have the potential to improve interaction between science, policy
and practice through improved stakeholder engagement and embedding research in societal processes, improving its relevance and practicability
to knowledge users.
However, these approaches donít guarantee the automatic integration of scientific knowledge into policy or practice unless
appropriate governance mechanisms are put in place. To be effective, SES research should be developed jointly by end-users from a wide range
of backgrounds and implementation contexts. In the case of Working for Water, turning its research investment into action requires the effective
coordination of multiple partner institutions, their mandates, and resources — particularly where expectations and operational standards may
“For science to have its desired impact and result in meaningful change, it must first be embedded in the society it
seeks to influence. For that to happen the artificial distinction between science and society, and the scientist and the layperson, must be
overcome,” says Brent Abrahams, lead author of the study published in the South African Journal of Science.
Read the paper
Abrahams, B., Sitas, N. and Esler, K.J. 2019. Exploring integrative research in the context of invasive alien plant
management. South African Journal of Science. Volume 115(3/4)
For more information, contact Brent Abrahams at email@example.com