Gloria
McLean-Anderson
A
critical evaluation of the research experiences of master and doctoral
students at Technikon Natal
There are indications that the emergence of global
trends in the production and dissemination of knowledge is influencing
science policies worldwide, and compelling universities and technikons
in South Africa to become more market oriented, competitive and entrepreneurial.
Some of these trends include new modes of knowledge production, increased
financial and academic accountability and distance education. The
changing higher education landscape worldwide has implications for
South African tertiary institutions. In addition, one of the objectives
of the democratic government that took power in 1994 was to transform
higher education. The publication of the White Paper on Education
in 1997, the establishment of the Council on Higher Education (CHE)
and the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC), and the National
Plan for Higher Education in 2001 heralded the beginning of change.
Consequently, it became necessary for higher education institutions
to deliberate on the future course of their undergraduate and postgraduate
teaching and training programmes. In this context, it is important
for universities and technikons to understand the needs of their postgraduate
students.
The overall aim of this study was to identify the
perceptions of ex-Technikon Natal (now the Durban Institute of Technology)
postgraduate students on their research experiences with regard to
supervision, communication, the Technikon generally, availability
of resources, finance, time, departments, faculties, research, research
methodology, statistics, library and expertise. The particular focus
was on postgraduate students registered at the Technikon Natal in
2001, whether or not they had submitted their research proposals.
A postal survey was carried out to determine the students' perceptions
of their research postgraduate experiences at the then Technikon Natal.
The results of the survey indicate that the majority
of postgraduate students have a negative perception of the Technikon.
Students feel that there are insufficient experienced supervisors
available for consultation, leading to unacceptable delays. With regard
to communication, students feel that the Technikon does not disseminate
enough information on processes and procedures about postgraduate
issues. Overall, students in the Health Sciences are more dissatisfied
than students in the other faculties. In fact, the postal survey reveals
that students in these other faculties are more positive than negative
about their postgraduate experiences. However, it is worth pointing
out that a large proportion of Science and Engineering students (38%)
are undecided on this matter. It is interesting to note that the open-ended
comments section at the end of the questionnaire reveals far more
negative perceptions than the closed questions. Students are dissatisfied
about the lack of modern computer facilities and available funds.
They also feel strongly that it takes too long to get a research proposal
approved. The majority feels that a postgraduate information kit would
assist greatly. Comments about Research Methodology as a subject are
particularly negative with regard to statistics, and the course, which
they feel is too general. Students do not seem to have any major difficulties
with the library services.
The Technikon has to put structures in place to improve
these negative perceptions and manage the students’ needs. Combined
with the impact of the merger of the former Technikon Natal and M.L.
Sultan Technikon, the effects of which are not yet fully understood,
the new Durban Institute of Technology should give serious consideration
to the needs of its postgraduate population, especially in the Faculty
of Health.
Back
to top